Jesus was a Muslim... Didn't you know that?

Or, why Jesus isn't a Christian

Published on June 12, 2006 By EmperorofIceCream In Misc

I have seen my Lord with the eye of my heart, and I said: "Who are You?" He said:"You."
(Diwan al-Hallaj, M. 10)

Your Spirit mixed with my Spirit little by little, by turns, through reunions and abandons.
And now I am Yourself, Your existence is my own, and it is also my will.
(Diwan al-Hallaj)

ana'l -Haqq - I am the Truth.
(this is the saying which apparently earned al-Hallaj his martyrdom - al Haqq also means God)

In the year 922 CE a man, al-Hallaj, utterly unknown in the West (though widely known in the Muslim world, and revered as a Sufi mystic, poet, and teacher) came before the legal and religious authorities of his day and, in an an ecstatic trance, uttered the words recorded above - ana'l-Haqq - I am the Truth, by which he meant that he had attained to such unity with God that he embodied in his own person the love of God for Man, the love of Man for God, to such a degree that he had become (in the words of the Jesus of the Christian tradition) the way, the truth, the life -

Jhn 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

for his temerity in making so bold a statement, al-Hallaj was executed, by crucifixtion.

I believe that Jesus the man lived, breathed, exercised his ministry as a prophet, and died pretty much as the Gospels report these events. I do not believe that Jesus the man was the Son of God, nor do I believe that he died for my sins and is the means of redemption. Though I could once say in all sincerity that his is the only name on which a man may call in order to be saved, I can no longer say so because I no longer believe that to be true.

Indeed, I have come to believe that I am my own salvation (my own Jesus) just as much as I am my own damnation (my own Adam). I'm little inclined to repeat what I've written elsewhere in defence of such a statement. Those who are interested, go read here (Link).

The 'Christ' of conventional Christianity is actually a form of blasphemy, the idolatry of a man and a prophet based on the propaganda of the tent-maker Paul, who was more determined to preach a 'christ' consonant with the ancient Hebrew scriptures (and so vindicate himself and his people) than he was to affirm that one more Messenger had come, preaching the same message that all the other Messengers had preached: worship God and love your neighbour better than you love yourself.

Since I believe that the spirit of God is infinitely more than the spirit of 'the Christ' I see no reason why that same spirit might not just as readily visit a Sufi poet and mystic as a Jewish carpenter - and in this sense 'Jesus' was indeed a Muslim. Those of you who read the linked article will encounter the Pentagrammaton, the five letter word that proceeds from the Tetragrammaton which is the closest thing that exists to an actual Name for 'God'.

I'm going to quote myself, from that same linked article.

Anyone who would be saviour to himself or others must be able to unite the Divine with the physical, overcome all opposites within himself, and at the same time maintain that tension in unity which is the source of all poetry and prophecy. It is this act of overcoming and submission which is designated by the term 'Jesus'. If you pronounce the Pentagrammaton in Hebrew it becomes 'Yeh-ha-shu-ah' which is usually translated as 'Joshua'. In the Greek of the New Testament it became 'Yay-su', which in English became 'Jesus'.

Jesus the Prophet (in whom I believe); Jesus the God-form (in whom I believe and whom I honor - though I give him no allegiance and he holds no place in my Ritual practice); and 'Jesus' the vocalization of the Pentagrammaton, in which I breathe and move as a fish breathes and moves in the sea; are fundamentally different entities. And all are equally different from 'Jesus the Christ', that blasphemous aberration and idolatrous figment whom most 'Christians' worship without ever knowing that, even according to the tenets of their own faith, this very act of worship is actually a damnable sin.

Jesus the Prophet was, as the Muslims attest, both a prophet and a man. Jesus the God-form is the actuation, the 'making real' in spiritual realms, of the veneration given (erroneously) to Jesus the man over 20 centuries. And Yeh-ha-shu-ah is a proceeding of the Spirit from the utterly unknowable, incomprehensible and Nameless Abyss that is 'God'.

And none of them have anything remotely to do with abomination that most 'Christians' profess to worship even while being utterly ignorant of the true nature of what they claim as God.

Which is why Jesus was never a Christian.

Comments (Page 3)

island_gurl12

on Jun 13, 2006

I believe, because when I asked I was answered, and when I turned my back on Him I was miserable. His presence has affected my life and my parents life very deeply. People dont recognize my father when they meet with him again after nearly half of a century. And him and I know that there is a reason for that. There are testimonies you wouldnt want to believe or you might consider as coincidence and/or made up.

I dont know the bible by heart. I probably should so I can defend my belief in front of those who like you challenge it

And Jesus was Jew!

KFC Kickin For Christ

on Jun 13, 2006

#36 by island_gurl12

I no longer believe in either Heaven or Hell

Doesn't matter if you do or don't. You'll find out soon enough.

The faith I now hold derives directly from the faith I once had. As a Christian

you're fooling yourself. I don't believe you ever had it to begin with. If you had, you wouldn't be here like this now. Job is a testimony to that fact.

The words I most often cite derive from the Pentateuch and from the epistles, not from the gospels. They are no more the words of 'Jesus Christ' than these words I'm currently typing. So there is no contradiction between citing the OT and having no use for the false 'Christ' of contemporary Christianity.

Oh yeah? You like Hebrews? Then let's start there.

Heb 1:1-2 God who in past times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by his Son whom he has appointed heir of all things by whom also he made the worlds.

God doesn't change. He spoke to us in the OT and He spoke to us in the NT. It's the same God. His message was the same. The only difference is HE came down to SHOW us the way. So it's ok to read the gospels now. Now that you know this.

and give me an account of your faith and why you believe. Do so, and I'll return the favor.

I think I did so on your other thread but again I'll elaborate here. Like a bird that has found his nest, so my soul hs found it's rest in the will of God. I have found out the reason for my existence. I know why I'm here, and where I'm going. Do you?

We all have God sized holes in our hearts as I'm sure you've heard. What have you filled your heart with and have you truly found contentment? You don't come across as so contented, peaceful and joyful by any stretch of the imagination.

EmperorofIceCream

on Jun 13, 2006

To island-gurl2:

I believe, because when I finally asked I was answered. But years later it transpired that what had answered me was not 'Jesus christ' but something entirely different, Nameless, and far more terrible.

I appreciate that there are many, many, genuine testimonies as to the transformative power of conversion to Christianity. But there are just as many, just as inspiring, stories of the transformative power of converting to Islam (the most widely known example being that of Malcolm X, perhaps), of converting to Judaism, of converting to the B'hai faith. And just as there are countless testimonies as to the martyrdom of the lovers of Jesus Christ so are there any number of testimonies as to the martyrdom of other believers in other faiths.

Simply because your father (and you also or so I presume)have experienced a transformative spiritual event does not make you a Christian. For more than twenty years I was convinced I was a Christian - despite the inner dissatisfaction and perpetual spiritual craving that I experienced, despite the steadily increasing certitude that the scriptures I studied, while they contained truths, were neither the whole of the truth nor yet that they pointed me towards something called 'the Christ'.

Only many years after the events of my crisis conversion did it occur to me that there was no necessary connection between those events and the Christian milieu that was the background to them. I came to identify myself as a Christian, not because there was anything specifically and identifiably Christian in the events themselves, but because the context of my life at the time (and my woeful ignorance of things spiritual) made Christianity the only explanation then available to me.

I maintained this identity as forcefully as I did (I was a zealot's zealot for over twenty years) not because I was convinced but because I was afraid to consider any other possibility. And it was the omnipresence in my life of this unspoken and deeply hidden fear that was my first clue as to what had actually befallen me - because the testimony of the Biblical scriptures concerning fear is simply this:

1Jo 4:18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.

All scripture, be it Christian, Islamic, Hindu, B'hai, or some other, is God-breathed and able to convict: and since, after twenty years of zealous faith, I was still afraid it became evident to me that what I had placed my faith in was defective and false. And it was from that moment that I finally began to exercise the freedom of the believer - which is to question God. As it's written in Isaiah:

Isa 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. and:

Isa 55:8 For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Isa 55:9 For [as] the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

What I found however was that as soon as I began to question and think for myself, instead of simply swallowing whole the dogmatic assertions of others, i encountered the most terrific opposition and hostility, because to question openly and honestly is to draw others into the possibility that what they believe has no basis in spiritual reality.

And since you've responded to this article in the way that you have, I will ask of you the same question that I asked of KFC - what reason do you have for believing that you are a Christian?

bakerstreet

on Jun 13, 2006

"Your presentation of yourself, your utter disregard, based on self-serving cynicism and the resentful ennui of a bored child, for the basic tenets of your supposed 'faith (which you use to castigate Muslims and anyone else you find to fall short of your supposed standards, is a testimony not to the power of the Risen Christ but to your own immaturity as believer. And as I pointed out, its the gross arrogance of those like yourself who preach one thing (oh not directly and overtly but through your contempt for others) that disgusts and appalls me and which I am no longer content to allow to pass without challenge - if only out of respect for the memory of the Christian that I myself once was."

lol, how's that for hypocrisy? You can't bear the idea that battle lines aren't drawn between me and you, so you have to divise them yourself by imposing standards that you think I am required to keep to. Your "side" defines itself with arrogance, and my "side" defines itself with humility? The medieval user manual says I have to fish for people so you castigate me for not riding around in a boat all the time?

For all the love of chaos you pretend, you have a damn hard time dealing with the undefinable. You, yourself castigate Christians for trying to define the undefinable. The whole basis of this blog is that Jesus wasn't Christianity portrays, and yet here you are, browbeating people for not diving in here like the inquisition to defend what you believe to be false.

This isn't about us, this is about how your definition of yourself falls apart if the "opposition" isn't what you demand it to be. Come on, you say things like:

"Now, believer, do as your Bible requires you to do - and give me an account of your faith and why you believe. Do so, and I'll return the favor."

Were you wearing a cape when you said that? That line deserved a cape, flowing in the wind; your opponent cowering in fear of you. I don't have to take my ball and go home, or run from you in fear, or even "deal" with it. You WANT people to run from you in fear, and I think that shows a deep-seated need to identify yourself with what you consider to be "powerful".

I don't see anything to be shocked about here. I see another mythology among many, which may or may not be true. I don't think it is, but that doesn't mean that I am threatened by it, not in the least. Defend your god if he needs to be defended by the likes of humanity. Mine doesn't.

"What I found however was that as soon as I began to question and think for myself, instead of simply swallowing whole the dogmatic assertions of others, i encountered the most terrific opposition and hostility, because to question openly and honestly is to draw others into the possibility that what they believe has no basis in spiritual reality."

Yet woe unto any opponent that questions and comes to conclusions that seem irrational to you, right? They should keep to the dogma and cower in fear in your presence. Heh.

EmperorofIceCream

on Jun 14, 2006

To KFC:

you're fooling yourself. I don't believe you ever had it to begin with. If you had, you wouldn't be here like this now.

You're at liberty to believe whatever you want - but by beginning in this way you demonstrate exactly the quality that I accuse you of being possessed by - the rush to judgment and the condemnation of those who refuse to think like you. Who are you to say what the nature of my faith is?

Heb 1:1-2 God who in past times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by his Son whom he has appointed heir of all things by whom also he made the worlds

What you're quoting is a statement by the proselytizing tent-maker whose objective was to create a doctrine that was consonant with the OT and which vindicated his people by showing the descent of Jesus the prophet, whom he conflated with Jesus the Christ, from the puritanical and Law-obsessed pharisees and sadducees - hence the tent-maker's repugnance towards homosexuals and women preachers.

A study of the gospels (and yes, I've read them many times) reveals Jesus the prophet to be far less concerned with observance of the literal tenets of the law and far more concerned with the love of the Father for his own sake and without regard to the fear of hell or the hope of heaven. To quote scripture is one thing. To quote it without understanding, as you do, is entirely another.

God doesn't change. He spoke to us in the OT and He spoke to us in the NT. It's the same God. His message was the same. The only difference is HE came down to SHOW us the way. So it's ok to read the gospels now.

Actually, it's profoundly obvious from a study of both the OT and the NT that while the nature of God doesn't change his behaviour in relation to the believer does - hence the often cited 'inconsistency' of the two narratives which is used as an excuse for unbelief. I refer you to the writings of Joachim of Flores for an exposition of the Three Ages of the Spirit - the age of the Father, in which merciless Judgment reigned; the Age of the Son, in which absolute Judgment is tempered by absolute Mercy; and the Age of the Holy Spirit in which the union of the Spirit of God with the Spirit of Man becomes manifest as a prelude to the end times and the Last Judgment.

The nature of God does not change - but the manifestation of that nature in its relation to the whole of creation does. Your comment is nothing more than a further manifestation of the ignorance on which you base your foolish, deceptive judgments.

Like a bird that has found his nest, so my soul hs found it's rest in the will of God. I have found out the reason for my existence. I know why I'm here, and where I'm going.

A pity, then, that you sound so very much like the believers I knew in the church to which I gave almost five years of my life: parroting pretty-sounding nonsense and irrelevant metaphor in a vain attempt to convince themselves and others that they were among the righteous rather than the lost.

I refer you to my reply to island-gurl and I ask you once again to defend your Lord against the accusation of his non-existence, rather than attempting to demonstrate why I'm 'wrong' in maintaining that non-existence against your hysterical prejudice.

EmperorofIceCream

on Jun 14, 2006

To BakerStreet:

the more you deny what your faith requires of you the more ridiculous you become - and the more evident is the canting nonsense you substitute for the dogmas and doctrines of the faith you profess. I believe the phrase 'Whited sepulchre' is appropriate at this point.

-----

on Jun 14, 2006

For all the love of chaos you pretend, you have a damn hard time dealing with the undefinable. You, yourself castigate Christians for trying to define the undefinable. The whole basis of this blog is that Jesus wasn't Christianity portrays, and yet here you are, browbeating people for not diving in here like the inquisition to defend what you believe to be false.

Ding-Ding-Ding! EXACTLY! Oy, Baker, If I could shake your hand now... Ah hell -- *shakes Bakers virtual hand*

You took the words and said them exactly how I would love to have. If I could've thought of them.

~L

EmperorofIceCream

on Jun 14, 2006

To Lucas:

still here? I thought you didn't want to play kick the puppy any more? But, since you evidently do...

It's not the part of a wise man, Lucas, to join a fool in his folly. Especially when his folly is unintelligible to you...

You took the words and said them exactly how I would love to have. If I could've thought of them.

bakerstreet

on Jun 14, 2006

"the more you deny what your faith requires of you the more ridiculous you become - and the more evident is the canting nonsense you substitute for the dogmas and doctrines of the faith you profess. I believe the phrase 'Whited sepulchre' is appropriate at this point."

"Faith" in the way you use it is just a human construct; a checklist of things you have to believe to be this or that. Which flavor of "faith" do you want me to adopt to be your villain? Do you want me to demand you acknowledge the transubstantiation, or should I be outraged that you are denying the trinity? Sadly, I'm not Bernardo Gui, nor are your ideas 'dangerous' to me.

If I was "whited" I'd be spitting doctrine and scriptures at you and secretly questioning them like most Christians. I openly admit that I don't follow them, and the literal 'word', while of philosphical value, isn't God's voice directly in my ear. You are just incensed that the rules of this Milton-esque conflict aren't being held to, and I'm not casting you out to rule rather than serve.

I value people like you, believe it or not. I think you shortchange yourself by defining yourself according to what you oppose, but you also go a long way toward showing that people are stuck in beliefs they've never questioned. Granted, it makes you impossible to deal with when people don't cower before your supposed unholy might, but you serve a purpose, nonetheless.

-----

on Jun 14, 2006

Well, I decided to come see how the thing was going, and saw that. I felt what Baker said was exact.

It's not the part of a wise man, Lucas, to join a fool in his folly. Especially when his folly is unintelligible to you.

Hmmm...Fool. *thinks* You? That's the only fool I see here. Well, I'm one right now, for bothering to come back to this thing.

~L

EmperorofIceCream

on Jun 14, 2006

To BakerStreet:

Your faith, on your own testimony, is a ragbag of ideas which (for all I know) may change on a daily basis dependant on the degree to which you find them acceptable or convenient. This may not be the actual case. The actual case may be, in reality, that the practice of your faith is consistent and stringent. But nobody could tell that's the case from what you yourself have presented here.

What you portray here is the image of a man whose faith is dead. The essence of religion is not what we make of it but what it makes of us.

Which flavor of "faith" do you want me to adopt to be your villain?

The kind that takes issue with others while being lifeless and meaningless in itself. But wait.... That would be the kind of faith you've exhibited here already - so there's nothing left for you to adopt - unless it's another pose, another posture, another pretence.

If I was "whited" I'd be spitting doctrine and scriptures at you and secretly questioning them like most Christians. I openly admit that I don't follow them, and the literal 'word', while of philosphical value, isn't God's voice directly in my ear.

Actually, that's not so. Compared to the original definition what you've presented here is another shoddy excuse designed to hide from yourself that what you once possessed is dead and gone. I should perhaps call you Lazarus - though I believe there was less of the stench of decay about him, even while still in the tomb, than there is about your writing here.

Mat 23:27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.
Mat 23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

I know. Quoting scripture at you is meaningless, right. But that doesn't deny it's power to describe you, even if it's content no longer reaches you.

A believer who professes that scripture is meaningless to him and whose beliefs consist in whatever is convenient to him. Lazarus, Lazarus, what a perfect example of the contemporary Christian you are. I can see your Jesus hugging himself with glee over the good job you're doing. But then, of course, the Word of Gord isn't the word in your ear, right? That would be just too... inconvenient.

Tova7

on Jun 14, 2006

I am a believer.

I wrote an article on how I came to meet Jesus long before I knew who He was. How He introduced Himself to me and I'd never heard of something called "The Bible." No one in my family was a Christian, no one talked about God..

Link

This article was just the beginning of my belief in Jesus. I love Him Emp, more than anything else in this life. He loved me, and came for me when there was nothing else.

He owns my heart and my loyalty.

But I won't lie. I am not a perfect Christian. Not even close. But then if I could be a perfect Christian, Christ wouldn't have even needed to come. I coulda paid my own bill as it were.

If someone asks for proof all I can offer is my heart. That is all I have. People can argue about scripture until the cows come home....but in the end, to me, I need the proof to be in the pudding. Meaning of course, I need to see evidence of Christ in my life.

Funny thing about that....when I am doing daily reading and studying of scripture and truly seeking His face...I am closer to Him and see His presence more clearly in my life. So if scripture were "wrong" then I don't believe that would be the case.

I choose to believe Jesus is God and died for my sins. I choose Him.

bakerstreet

on Jun 14, 2006

*Yawn*

A dead faith is one that got stuck hundreds of years ago and refuses to admit any inspiration or reflection. I should expect this from EoIC, because the only way his self image can be retained is if his enemies continue to define him. I mean, he's basically sitting there outraged because I won't brand him a heretic.

It's good for a few laughs, I guess. Let him condemn people for trying to view their religion in new ways when he, himself, is blogging on... a different perspective on Jesus. It's obvious that this venom is just disappointment that he can't bait the Jerry Falwell crowd into making enough of a stink. If that's what he wants, maybe he should have picked one of their forums.

This will stand as a glowing example of someone acting like a teenager who is totally annoyed that his parents are too darned open minded to really rebel against. What is the world coming to when you plan a war and your enemies don't care enough what you think to attack you, right? I mean, if I am not condemning his heresy it must be because my faith is just too shallow, lol...

EmperorofIceCream

on Jun 14, 2006

To BakerStreet:

from the outset, your contributions to this thread have been directed toward the author, not the article. Why is that? Comments directed toward description and analysis of your responses have been ignored and each response - despite the fact that you, Lazarus, assured me you had no interest in taking part - has been an attempt to turn away from the topic at hand to a discussion of myself.

My, how you dote on me.

You're at liberty to leave now. Not that you will, of course. I see the fascination in your eyes, little Lazarus. Perhaps, as a child, you longed for some large, dark eyed man to fiddle around with you in a darkened room? Sorry, sweets. You're not my type.

island_gurl12

on Jun 14, 2006

Wow! I am wowed by your answer honestly. You are a very smart/intelligent person. You like to reason alot. I'm not criticizing, pretty admirative really! I guess I dont reason too much because then my head hurts lol. I didnt read all the other replies but here's what i have to say.

I know there are mysteries in the Bible, and I dont bother exploring them because what is a mystery means it can only be revealed by God right?

I think your point is that, whatever higher itentity that is worshipped by Jews, Muslims, Christians, and so on is the same one and only itentity. Is that right? Correct me if i'm wrong, i'm slow sometimes.

I for one dont really think it's like that. I understand that mankind has always had the need to worship, mankind has always had the intuition of a greater Being to which it owed life. But I also know from the Bible that my God is a jealous God and he cannot accept me worshiping something else with a different name.

Now to say that Jesus is an idol. I have to disagree yet again. The trinity thing. I dont agree that there are 3 beings that equal to one God. Nope. But that's just me. If God is the same in the Old Testament as he is in the new, how can He all of a sudden become three, right? I think there is one God with three different nominations/descriptions whatever (The Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit). Just as I am a daughter, a sister, a friend and so on.

How can I prove that God is GOD? That's a tough one. It's as if I was trying to prove that the wind is there even though I cant see it. I guess it is just a matter of faith. You'll argue that you have faith in something else and that i works wonders for you. And to that I dont know what to say. Just that my mind and my heart are at peace. Are yours?

I suppose my answer sucks big time, I'm not as bright as you are. And probably some of the stuff I said sounds corny. And I dont want to preach to you. I dont even know the Bible as well as you do. I just hope you'll find in the coming answers what you're looking for.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!