"If it's provable we can kill it."
Or, there's infinite strength in America - but you have no idea where it lies
Published on December 2, 2007 By EmperorofIceCream In Misc
America is the last great hope of the world, because in America a person can be free. Free, but not absolutely free. The constraints upon their freedom under which Americans live are unique in the history of the world. They are not the arbitrary dictats of a hereditary Monarch. They are not the equally arbitrary, but historically far bloodier and more destructive, dictats of an ideologically driven elite (though the Democrats, and never was there a more bitter irony than the naming of that party, are pushing towards becoming that - an ideologically driven elite convinced of their own rectitude and intent upon limiting the lives of others to their own half-assed and bigoted vision of the good life). They are constraints imposed by law, laws decided upon and enacted through public debate and public consensus.

I can remember being a child of four or five years (my memory goes back to when I was three years old) and dreaming of America. I can remember watching reports on the UK television news from Highway 19 in Vietnam. All my life, America has been the backdrop to my consciousness, my will, and my desire. There has never been a time, throughout my 47 years of life, that I have not wanted to be here, have not wanted to be a part of America. I can remember dreams I had when I was four years old, that consisted of nothing but the word 'America' repeated endlessly.

Being chronically short-sighted, utterly flat-footed, and a gimp with only one fully functional hand, I doubt very much that I'll ever be called upon to serve in the Armed Forces of my adopted country. But I can imagine a time in which it might be necessary to defend my neighborhood against armed mobs of raghead insurgents - and should such a time come then both I and Sabrina will be out on the barricades, and we'll kill as many of them as we can before they kill us.

Because America is worth fighting for. And America is worth dying for.

Why?

The Rule of Law. I know of no higher or greater or more noble conceit of the human mind than this: that all men are equal before the law. All men, irrespective of wealth, or social rank, or any other distinction. All men are equal before the law. Because this equality is the birthright and inheritance of every citizen born on American soil, and because America is so vast, and so hugely endowed with natural resources of every kind, so that no American ever needs to be dependent on the largesse of foreign powers, so much so that no American ever needs to fear the malice of such powers, you have forgotten just how precious this political and social and economic endowment is.

No European can say anything remotely similar. The State in Europe, in all its authoritarian excesses, evolved as it has, precisely because no one on that continent could say what every American has always said: we are secure. The State in Europe evolved in the way it has precisely because every State was constantly under threat from every other State. As Europeans we have all lived with the constant knowledge that our neighbours mean us harm - that they mean our destruction.

Not so in America, divided from the rest of the world as it is by two immense oceans. This constant insecurity has led to a cult of authoritarianism, and a doctrine of States rights (fully autonomous political entities that are utterly at odds with the American conception of 'states') that is completely antithetical to the American notion of power constrained by law. This idea of the lawful constraint of power, and it's delimitation according to the will of the people is one reason why America is the last hope of the world. Because this aspiration, that the power of the powerful should be rendered subject to the will of the ordinary people, your average Joe Blow, is a scandal in relation to the development of political philosophy in the history of the the thought of the West: a scandal, an outrage, and something utterly alien to that line of thought that moves through Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Hegel - the line of thought that has dominated Western development, political and social, since the sixteenth century.

No man is above the law. No man. Not the President, not his closest advisors, not his most intimate friends and confidantes. No man is above the law. This idea in itself, utterly revolutionary and utterly radical, is an American creation and is a shining example to the rest of the world - and it is a mark of how far the American people have fallen that they are willing to entertain the idea that there are exceptions, granted under Presidential privilege, to that principle. Scooter Libby should not have been pardoned. Clinton, that adulterous egomaniac, should never have been allowed to 'pardon' his cronies and benefactors.

The more the people of America allow the adulteration of the vision of what America is, the more they prove themselves to be unworthy inheritors of that vision. America is more than you. America is worth more than the value of your prejudices.

All Persons Are Endowed By Their Creator With Inalienable Rights. This is possibly the most revolutionary political precept ever devised by the mind of man. Let me explain. I am a European by heritage. I was schooled in that stream of thought regarding politics which derives from Plato and is more than 5000 years old. And nowhere in that stream of thought is there anywhere any suggestion that the common citizen has any rights which exist outside the will of the State. For the intelligent, politically educated European, the state is the Be All and End All of existence. The State, like God, gives and the State takes away. And the State is invested in blood, and in family. Royal blood and Royal family. The State, in other words, derives its existence from a divinely favored but humanly limited social structure: the Royal Family.

Nothing could be further from the truth, here in America. Here, the State derives from the will of the people and is subject to that will. Whereas in Europe the 'State' is no more than the arbitrary construct of the will of particular persons and does no more than serve whatever end those persons decide it shall serve, here in America the State is a servant, not a master. In today's world nothing could be more antithetical to the idea that our superiors have the right to tell us what we should do. The citizen of the American Republic has no superior. Not because of any innate superiority or ability - but because the law says it shall not be so.

America exists as a nation under law, and a nation formed by law, and as such it is (so far as I know) unique in the history of the world.

While the contemporary situation in Europe has moved away from an unthinking obedience to Royalty, it has not progressed, in its theoretical existence, from an unthinking adherence to and belief in the efficacy of the State to solve any and all problems confronted by the European public at large. Kings solved problems. Now that the Kings are dead, the State is expected to take their place. Here the opposite is true. Since there never were American Kings, the only people left to solve whatever problems we may have is you and I. This is sometimes a good thing and sometimes a bad thing. There is a happy medium between total reliance on the self and total reliance on the State. The Genius of America is to point towards that happy medium.

American history points us towards the efficacy of the common man in solving the problems that confront him. As inheritors of that tradition, we can deny the competence of the State to organize our lives for us. Americans don't need to be told what to do, and we are guaranteed the freedom to do what we know to be right by the Constitution. We are neither children nor slaves. We are free.

And the simple fact that we can say so, and back up that assertion through law, makes America and Americans unique in the history of the world. And because we are unique there is upon us a reqirement that is also unique: that we be true to the inheritance with which we are endowed - because that inheritance of freedom, and if necessary bloody-minded intransigence, has never been equalled by any other nation on earth.

We can say 'NO' to power - and compel power to comply.

America is the last great hope of the world for precisely that reason. We can say 'NO' to power, and compel the powerful to comply.

I don't say that America is perfect. I don't say that America embodies her own best principles and beliefs. But I do say that America is the only nation on earth ever to attempt to embody in her practice the ideals of her political vision. If she has so far failed it's because those charged with embodying those ideals are human, and prone to failure. But that does not deny that America is the last great hope of Man, because in her lives the deepest aspiration towards freedom combined with order that the human mind has yet conceived.

God bless America. May she thrive and prosper. May her enemies diminish, and be destroyed.

Comments
on Dec 03, 2007
Excellent and positive, Darling. Too bad far too many Americans fail to grasp some of these basic but crucial ideas.


Awww... Thank you - and I couldn't agree more.

It's not the government's job to educate their citizens about their legal rights. Perhaps it should be, but it's not currently on the agenda beyond a watered down history or civics lesson in elementary school.


That's the problem. The only people who have any incentive to learn what their rights and obligations are, are people like me. The rest of you sit on your thumbs because you already know you have rights (even if you don't know what they are) and you know that no one would ever abuse those rights.

Except you only have to watch 'Cops' to see people handing their rights away every time they're questioned by the police, to see them doing the prosecutor's work themselves by deliberately and consciously convicting themselves through their own ignorance of what is and is not required of them.

on Dec 03, 2007

Great article! One thing I'd like to comment on:

All Persons Are Endowed By Their Creator With Inalienable Rights.

Are you aware of the military commisions act of 2006? Basically it states that the U.S government does not have to provide legal rights to anyone they deem to be a terrorist. Sounds great right? Well, how do they determine if you're a terrorist? Basically this act makes it so that all they have to do is say you're a terrorist, no proof necessary, and voilla you're stripped of all your rights and protections. This applies to U.S citizens.

With the passage of this act, they can seize you in the night, and don't have to notify your family, your lawyer, or even let a judge in the court system know about it. They can hold you indefinitely without trial, and when said trial does occur it is judged by a panel of military officers. Those officers are chosen by the department of defence, not the civillian court system. Furthermore with this act, they can present evidence and testimony that you are not entitled to see or hear if it is deemed classified for national security. 

With this act, if your government says you are a terrorist, you're screwed. You have no chance to defend yourself, no fair chance to prove your innocence. Under this law it's guilty until proven innocent, and it overturns the magna carta and basic rights of habeas corpus which have been around for hundreds of years as the defacto benchmark for a basic judicial system. With no legal rights pertaining to equal access to evidence, access to lawyers (a military officer is appointed as your defence, you have no say in the matter) No laws or rights to a quick trial- if they feel that there's no chance the military commission will convict you as previously stated they can hold you indefinitely.

The scary thing was that when this bill was passed there was nary a peep from the media, other than of course the smiling photo-op as Bush signed it, in which he spoke about securing America from terrorism. Secure indeed.

As Ben Franklin said:

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.

Sadly, the death of democracy never comes in one big dramatic event which is why it's so easy to dismiss. It is the slow and methodical chipping away of liberties, the gradual eliminations of laws and checks and balances in the name of national security that truly kill it. When the day comes when your government can round up and imprison anyone simply because they say you're a bad guy (no proof necessary) you know there's something wrong. Democracy didn't go out with a bang, it died with a whimper and no one heard it because they were all busy cheering their secure future.

 

on Dec 03, 2007

Fantastic article.  It seems that those who understand and appreciate what this country means the most are those who weren't born on our soil.  The rest of us take it all for granted.

And that's a real shame.

on Dec 03, 2007
Are you aware of the military commisions act of 2006? Basically it states that the U.S government does not have to provide legal rights to anyone they deem to be a terrorist. Sounds great right? Well, how do they determine if you're a terrorist? Basically this act makes it so that all they have to do is say you're a terrorist, no proof necessary, and voilla you're stripped of all your rights and protections. This applies to U.S citizens.


I have to say that this is some of the most hysterical, paranoid nonsense I've yet read on JU. The act relates to alien unlawful combatants, not to citizens. Yes, it's conceivable its powers might be misused - but that's true of any act of government. Any act, any government. No system is perfect, and no system is completely invulnerable to misuse. But there is no trace within the act itself of the kind of malice, the evil intent, that you presuppose with such breathless expectation.

You're one of those that wish to believe the worst of America so that you can point a finger and say "I told you so." The overwhelming weight of the activities of American government is to serve the purposes of the Constitution. The horrible excitement you exhibit at the thought of America betraying its own best principles indicates, to me, that you are one of those who would rather see his own house burn than help put out the flames. And that, it also seems to me, is a commonplace of the thought of the so called 'left' in America.

There's little hope for one such as you, not because you are beyond hope but because you willfully choose its opposite. Why that should be I haven't yet decided, but more and more I'm coming to see this... whatever it is, as indicative of the nature of a certain kind of spoilt, self-indulgent, ill-disciplined and entirely selfish kind of American.

What? Don't your toys work as you'd like them to? Are hard and difficult things expected of you? Are you, perhaps, required to be an adult?

Keep your paranoia and resentment for places like the Democratic Underground. You will find no welcome for them here.
on Dec 03, 2007
Try to tell this to the perpetually outraged, however, (who remind me more and more of the very same Muslims they complain about) and you're likely to be branded as an agent of the enemy (ie: the government) or a garden variety fascist. What's ironic is that most of the name callers have no idea what fascism is in the first place.


As ever, my darling, you sum up in a single paragraph everything I'ne taken an entire article to say. You have a wonderful grasp of how not to bloviate.
on Dec 04, 2007
Alright you don’t have to keep your yard clean or vote republican. Very nice article, you may rule over all ice cream as far as I’m concerned.

If I may humbly ask, do you think as the “last great hope of the world” we should enlighten others by force of arms? And if so, is that not like a monarchy telling every one what’s good for them?

Be kind I have a new girlfriend and she’s keeping me drunk.
on Dec 04, 2007

have to say that this is some of the most hysterical, paranoid nonsense I've yet read on JU. The act relates to alien unlawful combatants, not to citizens. Yes, it's conceivable its powers might be misused - but that's true of any act of government. Any act, any government. No system is perfect, and no system is completely invulnerable to misuse. But there is no trace within the act itself of the kind of malice, the evil intent, that you presuppose with such breathless expectation.

You're one of those that wish to believe the worst of America so that you can point a finger and say "I told you so." The overwhelming weight of the activities of American government is to serve the purposes of the Constitution. The horrible excitement you exhibit at the thought of America betraying its own best principles indicates, to me, that you are one of those who would rather see his own house burn than help put out the flames. And that, it also seems to me, is a commonplace of the thought of the so called 'left' in America.

There's little hope for one such as you, not because you are beyond hope but because you willfully choose its opposite. Why that should be I haven't yet decided, but more and more I'm coming to see this... whatever it is, as indicative of the nature of a certain kind of spoilt, self-indulgent, ill-disciplined and entirely selfish kind of American.

What? Don't your toys work as you'd like them to? Are hard and difficult things expected of you? Are you, perhaps, required to be an adult?

Keep your paranoia and resentment for places like the Democratic Underground. You will find no welcome for them here.

Yes you're exactly right, it DOES talk about unlawful enemy combatants..... the only thing is, if you read it, nowhere does it say that an unlawful enemy combatant is exclusively for foreigners. U.S citizens are included in that too. I have no desire to believe the worst in America, and I have no "horrible excitement" at the U.S betraying it's own citizens. I'm merely trying to present an alternative viewpoint and have constructive discussion about our differences. At no point have I ever launched into a personal attack against you, OR made assumptions about your beliefs (like you just made assumptions about my beliefs in your last post) Nor am I an American, but I am dismayed at this "left vs right" crap. I think that anyone who is a "hardcore left-winger" or "harcore right-winger" is an absolute idiot. People should think for themselves and not choose to slot themselves into a political archetype that was pre-made by someone else. To do so is the epitomy of laziness. Citizens should be critical of every law passed, every action that the government takes, ESPECIALLY if you voted for the government of the day. That is true civic duty and virtue.

At the end of the day, the most important thing you can do is question your government to keep them accountable. You should do this even more so if you support that government because that will then re-affirm that you made the right decision in the first place!

on Dec 04, 2007
When we give the government the ability to tax us, arrest us, defend us, we also give them the responsibility to do so without abusing that power. That is, they should only tax us what they need to run the government. They should only arrest us when there is probable cause for that arrest. They should defend us properly, but without limiting our rights and freedoms. The only check on that responsibility is the citizen, through voting, or through revolution if it comes to that. So when they pass this act, which may be abused, they also have the responsibility not to abuse it.
on Dec 07, 2007
To: Artysim

I take less exception to your post now I know you're not an American (neither am I technically - merely a permanent resident on my way to citizenship). Nothing annoys me more than the attitude of certain Americans which regards their country as the font of all evil in the world.

There is a contradiction between the word 'Inalienable rights' and the clear implication of the statement that these rights belong to all men. Whether the original founders intended them to apply to all men, simply because they are men, or whether they were intended to apply to all men as they found themselves within the territories of the USA is something that could be debated. Personally, I incline to believe that they really did mean to include all men simply as men.

Which is a fine political sentiment and a very impractical political reality. I would argue that they should be understood to mean - all men within the territorial boundaries of the USA, and I should certainly prefer to interpret it as all men within the territories of the USA who are citizens of the USA. It's time (past time) for a new discrimination and a renewed sense of what an American is. There are a variety of routes to becoming an American. You can be born here. You can become first a permanent resident, and then a citizen. And I would say that the great benefits conferred by the Constitution ought (as in the moral imperative) to be reserved to those who have demonstrated at least this much commitment to America - that they are citizens by naturalization or by birth.

And in all honesty, and in order to be consistent with what I actually believe, I'm not at all certain that citizenship should be granted on the basis of the happy accident of one's birth. I'm rapidly and strongly inclining to the idea that citizenship should be an earned privilege and rot a right.

I agree that my first response to you was intemperate and impolite, my excuse being that, thinking you were an American, I thought you to be of that hopeless generation of young Americans who can see no good in their country and look elsewhere, particularly toward Europe for whatever it is they imagine constitutes 'hope'. I find such people infinitely annoying and I treat them with no respect at all. So if I lumped you in with this caitiff crew by mistake I apologize.

Yes you're exactly right, it DOES talk about unlawful enemy combatants..... the only thing is, if you read it, nowhere does it say that an unlawful enemy combatant is exclusively for foreigners.


This is true. An American citizen could be judged to be an unlawful enemy combatant. The young man captured in Afghanistan fighting with the Taliban is an example, as is (or so I believe) the shoe-bomber. But each of those persons were obviously engaged in acts designed to be attacks against America. No American official wants to randamly pick-up an American citizen and haul him off to detention and torture - because once that situation became known (and I grant you it might take awhile) the American people would crucify him. What Europeans and others fail to grasp is that the American people are fundamentally committed to Justice - even if their governments are less so. And because the American people are committed to that idea they are willing to tolerate a great deal of injustice in the world, committed at American hands, in order to be just to themselves and those they have elected.

But once they become convinced that some elected official, be he dog-catcher or President, has abused that trust then they are remarkably swift to repay. But it takes them awhile to become convinced.

but I am dismayed at this "left vs right" crap. I think that anyone who is a "hardcore left-winger" or "harcore right-winger" is an absolute idiot. People should think for themselves and not choose to slot themselves into a political archetype that was pre-made by someone else.


There is neither a 'hard left' nor a 'hard right' in America. There are only the vapidities of confused 'conservatives', and even more confused 'socialists'. What most Europeans, and others, fail to realise is that the general American population is utterly ignorant of how their political system works, and entirely indifferent to any outcome that system provides. The lives of hundreds of millions of Americans never, ever intersect with the activities of the Federal State. And in the common imagination, the only lives that do belong to criminals. When most Americans think 'effective government' they think 'local government'. Countless millions of Americans pay no attention at all to their central government until some truly national catastrophe strikes. The rest of the world is an irrelevance, because America contains within itself everything it needs to live. And to most Americans the activities of their government abroad are needless distractions pursued by those who wish to make a name for themselves in Washington, having nothing to do with the real needs of the American people.

THere are only two grounds which, for most Americans, provide truly sunstantive reasons for engagement in foreign affairs: charity, and the overthrow of tyranny. Other than that, we don't want to know, because there's no need for us to know.
on Dec 07, 2007
If I may humbly ask, do you think as the “last great hope of the world” we should enlighten others by force of arms? And if so, is that not like a monarchy telling every one what’s good for them?


Personally, and as a way of putting an end to the outrageous demands of the rest of the world for American aid (aid that will never be reciprocated should America ever need it) I think we should nuke all y'all motherfuckers and be done with you. You've all sold your birthright to the chimera of multicultural socialism, you've sold out to the belief that every human being is 'as good' as every other, and y'all have become cesspits of bastardization and mongrelization. Be damned to you. I'd let you all rot, because none of you are wothy of what America has to offer you.