"If it's provable we can kill it."
Or, on effacement
Published on September 3, 2007 By EmperorofIceCream In Misc
A warning in advance. This article deals with issues of deviant sex and deviant sexuality and discusses them graphically, with no consideration (other than this warning) given to the more tender sensibilities of some among us. If you're offended or disturbed by such things - read no further.


Dylan Zimmerman recently wrote an article to whichich I responded a couple of times. Her original article and my responses can be found here. (Link)

The comment in Ms Z's aricle I want to respond to is found at its end, its very last lines. They read "But I have to write I have to write I have to write I have to write. I don't have anything else. I have no face, no voice, no accent or eyes. "I have no face, I have wanted to efface myself".

The line she quotes is from Plath's 'Tulips' (an interesting exercise in disguising self-pity as resignation - she was a very "stupid pupil" indeed, was Ms. Plath) and the phrase that caught my attention is 'I have wanted to efface myself'. I know something about effacement - because I've made it happen, more than once. It's easy. All you need is a whip (or in the particular instance I'll relate shortly, a riding crop) and a mirror. If you read Dylan's article you'll see I also became involved in a sub (that's a pun, by the way) conversation with Dharmagrl. Her questions, along with Dylan's comment, inspired this... narration-meditation.

One more thing before I get to the meat (as it were) of what I want to talk about, Dear Reader. I've been a contributor to JU for quite awhile now, and during that time I've been told that my life and my desires are a fiction or a pose or both. That I and my wife are actually one person with two accounts; that what I've occasionally revealed about my sexual nature is simply the equivalent of a desire to appear in a black crepe-paper cape and plastic vampire fangs and shout 'BOO!".

Those who read are at liberty to believe or not, as they choose. But don't take up space here with comments that are no more, in effect, than variations on "I don't believe you and I think you are sick.". I'll simply delete them.

And now, Dear Reader, to borrow a phrase from my darling wife... Onward, through the fog.

ef·face, ef·faced, ef·fac·ing, ef·fac·es:

To rub or wipe out; erase.
To make indistinct as if by rubbing
To make (oneself) inconspicuous; withdraw (oneself) modestly or shyly.

In other words, to make something disappear. The problem is that most people think that disappearing means going away, so that effacing a thing is to make it invisible; occasionally, the more sophisticated will realise that being invisible doesn't necessarily render it not-present. So then, effacement becomes making something not-to-be-here-anymore.

I can make you 'not-to-be-here-anymore' while making you visible to yourself, in a mirror, in such a way that it becomes impossible for you to deny the reality of what you see while simultaneously making it impossible for you to accept what you see as you. I can make you disappear by making you visible, and compelling you to see.

At one time I had a lover, whom we'll call Selene (which is also a pun). She's smart enough to recognise the nature of the pun, and private enough to appreciate not being exposed here. It would mortify her to have this repeated in a public forum in a way which might identify her.

We met online and talked for six months before our first face-to-face meeting. She made that stipulation because, in her experience (and mine), virtual relationships are just that - virtual - without sufficient substance to bear any kind of reality other than those which are purely and completely imaginary. Actually, she could have demanded a year and I would have waited. I was determined to meet her. When we finally met we discovered that what had begun as a primarily intellectual discussion, and then a heatedly addictive series of shared fantasies explored via phone and cyber-sex, actually had substance enough to sustain a relationship that lasted two and a half years.

We generally met for long weekends once every two or three weeks, usually at my apartment. And the rest of the time we communicated via the net, and at least once every evening we played long, complicated 'phone-sex' games that were actually exercises in psychological manipulation and sexual control. But at the core of everything was what we called 'the moment', which occurred in its most extreme forms (and could last hours) when we met face-to-face together.

The 'moment'. I see now, as I could not see then, blinded as I was by my utter lust for her, that 'the moment' was merely one more of those clever devices that allows a sexual submissive to manipulate a sexual dominant into giving her what she wants, when she wants - while the dominant, smugly and stupidly, believes himself to be in total control. I'm older and wiser now, and things would follow a rather different path if I were to go through a similar experience again. But I digress.

No matter the fact that, at the time, I couldn't see the uses to which she put our 'moments' they were instances in which tremendous sexual and psycho-sexual energy was summoned and released between us. And to Selene they could be and often were moments (that word, again) of extreme sexual terror. We played regularly with sexual asphyxia, games in which I controlled her breathing so that at the moment of her most extreme sexual excitement her brain was so starved of oxygen that she would hallucinate vividly - and had the perfect justification for the animal abandon, the utter wantonness (she always liked the words wanton and wantonness) of her flesh, how it moved.

That was something I soon discovered about her. She couldn't be present, to witness the things she did, and more importantly, to acknowledge them as things she wanted to do. And having realised that this was so, it became my determination to find ways in which to force her to be there, to see, to acknowledge in herself, and to confess. She hated me for making her make her confession, and when she hated me worst and hardest was my own preferred moment for my orgasm. The more she hated me, the harder she fought, the more useless her struggles were because defeated by desires I'd roused and made impossible for her to control, then the deeper was my excitement and the more inspired I became in the techniques i used to torment her.

One of the things she hated/loved most was the sea-chest that stood at the end of my bed in my tiny bedroom in my apartment. I no longer have the original chest (though I have something very similar). It remained behind in England when I left. It stood about two and a half feet tall, by about three feet long. it was built of heavy wood and was bound around its length and breadth with strips of old ornamental iron. It was at least a couple of hundred years old and was a strong as a rock. I'd modified it by screwing steel rings into each corner at top and bottom, and by passing velcro strips through each ring I had a perfectly good platform to which I could bind her.

With Selene I never really developed my taste for blood-play (as the practice of cutting is called in the BDSM communities) in the way that I have with Sabrina. It wasn't that such things were 'out of bounds' or covered by a safe-word. I was so obsessed with breath-play (erotic asphyxia), with the utter joy of being in her body as I choked her repeatedly, of feeling the helplessness with which she drove against me in response, that almost nothing else was of interest to me. Nothing else, except the whip and the crop.

I'd bind her to the lid of the chest, in ways which were as painful for her as possible. And then I'd leave her in that position for as long as I could bear to delay what I intended to do (usually no more than fifteen or twenty minutes). And then I'd return and begin by beating her breasts, usually with just the tips of the Cat O' Nine's braids. Very, very few people appreciate how painful light strokes repeated many times can become, especially in sensitive areas. When she began to sob with hate and rage, and horror at the ways her thighs moved, her hips pushed up and forward, at how wet she had become (I'd take that wetness on my hand and make her taste it) I'd move on to the crop.

With which I'd beat the mound of her vagina. Over and over and over again. Never very hard, because brute force is absolutely not necessary to cause the most exquisite pain, watching as she raged and jerked and moaned. When she was helpless and incoherent and stoned out of her mind on endorphins I'd let her up and make her stand in front of the mirror. And then with the butt of the whip or the crop I'd fuck her, while she watched. I'd make her dance on it, a leather thong wrapped around her throat and my left wrist so I could twist it tighter, and tighter. While she watched, and struggled hopelessly to breathe and her body betrayed her endlessly. Watched what it was she actually and truly wanted to happen as it happened. Made her watch while her meat, the flesh of her, danced and raved and begged.

And at the critical moment she was effaced, made not to be-there-anymore in the very act of seeing herself as she wanted to be. Which would have been just what she wanted, had I not made her say "Thank you". Had I not asked her "Is that you? Is that you?" And to her utter and absolute horror she always said "Yes".

I know something about effacement, about absence; and about presence. I doubt very much if Ms. Zimmerman would recognise any of those qualities of human experience if they got up together and bit her in the ass. Twice. But then, neither would very many others, and neither she nor they are to be blamed for that. But Ms. Zimmerman is neither as unique, nor as beautiful, as she thinks she is, nor as fascinating in her craving for effacement as some others.

But she certanly has potential. And with only a little luck she'll meet someone both willing and able to pull her face from the bones beneath it and feed it to her by hand. And make her thank him for forcing her to eat it. And in all sincerity, I wish her that little bit of luck.

But I'll say this to her, and to Dharmagrl also: be careful what you awaken, lest you be unable to make it sleep again. We all have our Demons, and all of them are real. But not all of us are prepared to live with them once they are awake, and raging.

Be careful what you awaken, lest you be unable to make it sleep again.

Comments
on Sep 03, 2007
I'm not sure what the appropriate comment to make here is. I did read all the way through this, and honestly, I don't have an interest in BDSM beyond the playful crap you can purchase online in kits.

I have seen people express interest in yours and Sabrina's relationship on here before and often times to me it seems like it is not a genuine interest in developing something similar in their own lives so much as an attempt to appear "kinky" to other JUs and to impress you and/or Sabrina.

I've no doubt your for real and probably in ways that would make me very uncomfortable.
on Sep 03, 2007

Did I tell ya Lucas emailed me about 6 months ago, asserting that he and g/f were interested in exploring BDSM and asking for 'pointers?' (i shit you not.)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, I about pissed my pants laughing.  Then, I gagged and retched and about threw up at the thought of Lucas and his hefty finance-ee bumping uglies (I'm trying desperately to NOT associate BDSM with those two.  Unsuccessfully).

I don't mind being asked by sincerely interested parties, (and in fact I owe one such party an email at the moment,i just can't seem to get started on it) but sheesh, Lucas knows i detest him--and i don't think he's ever been sincere about a thing in his life

He was trying to kiss your ass.  It'd be like him emailing me and asking me to teach him how to knit. 

The only useful thing I could have him do with a pair of needles wouldn't include socks or a sweater - matter of fact, it wouldn't include yarn at all.

The more I learn about the two of you, the more respect I have for the both of you.

Be careful what you awaken, lest you be unable to make it sleep again.

Thank you for the advice, and I will be careful.  I know that there's a part of me that.....well, that would shock most people if they knew what it was about.  Fuck, it shocks me sometimes.  I'm also aware that it's a part of me that, once awakened, would be very difficult to (as you said) put back to sleep again.  I'm not prepared to awaken it - and when I say prepared I mean it in the literal sense of the word.  I'm not ready, and I don't know if I'll ever be ready. So, I leave it alone. 

As I said to your wife, the more I learn about you, the more respect I have for the both of you.  You are both living a life of honesty; you're being true to yourselves.  That's a rare thing, I think. 

on Sep 03, 2007
Thank you for the advice, and I will be careful. I know that there's a part of me that.....well, that would shock most people if they knew what it was about. Fuck, it shocks me sometimes. I'm also aware that it's a part of me that, once awakened, would be very difficult to (as you said) put back to sleep again. I'm not prepared to awaken it - and when I say prepared I mean it in the literal sense of the word. I'm not ready, and I don't know if I'll ever be ready. So, I leave it alone.


Actually, the truth is more like this. Should it ever truly wake, it will wake. But there's nothing at all to say it will and you're right (in your circumstances) not to play with fire. And thank you for saying nice things about us.
on Sep 03, 2007
I've no doubt your for real and probably in ways that would make me very uncomfortable.


I'm a perfectly charming monster. And were we ever to meet, I promise you there wouldn't be a scalpel or ballgag or whip anywhere to be seen. Not even fluffy ones. Besides, Sabrina would be unhappy if I tortured you, even a little bit. So fret not.
on Sep 03, 2007
Interesting article. I'm not at all into the whole BDSM thing but don't hold any sort of judgments about those who are. Frankly I feel it's none of my business one way or the other.

I've been with women who were aggressive and those who expected me to be so, it's all good. Whatever floats your boat.
on Sep 04, 2007
At the heart of this I see a discussion of the levels of self-awareness. And I don't mean average Joe's idea of what "self-awareness" means - which usually has to do with what we're thinking and doing, and being aware that we are thinking or doing it, but a Total Awareness of onesself. Who AM I really - physically and mentally?

There are other ways to get this. Have an operation where your chest cavity has to be opened, and do it without anasthesia. Then when the doctor is pushing one of your lungs aside to start carving on your heart, sit up and look over the towel. That oughta do the trick. You'll see really quickly, if you don't already, what EoI means when we he says "We're meat."

Total Awareness is something that most people spend a lot of time, consciously and unconsciously, avoiding. Why? Because it's fucking painful. So painful I certainly haven't come anywhere close to Total Awareness. I don't have the balls for it. My hand is in the air - I am guilty as charged.

So it doesn't suprise me that simulating threat of death would bring one to that place. And the more you make them believe it, the more they walk right to the edge of their own mortality and stare it down, and...there's some genuine self-awareness sitting right there waiting. I imagine people that see battle experience similar things.

Sorry for the digression, but these thoughts came to mind

on Sep 04, 2007
Probably a poor choice of words on my part. I really need to think more. By 'simulated,' I was giving Simon the benfit of the doubt that he didn't sincerely intend to kill. (If he did, that's a different blog )
on Sep 04, 2007
He won't. "There'll Never be Another You" as the song goes. And though that song was a bit more flowery and doesn't include whips and whatever, love is love, and when you find it, killing it is the last thing that will happen But see, there I go applying logic again. Hope I didn't ruin anything for you...hahahaha.

Hugs,
Ock
on Sep 04, 2007
Passion doesn't think. You can think about passion, but there is no thought during it. Which is why you disappear, only to reappear as you. Which is why, before engaging in blood sports or breath play, or any of the innumerable BDSM practices that are potentially life-threatening, you have to know yourself; know what you're capable of, and in considerable depth.

Which is why the net, in the form of a particular chat client known as VP (Virtual Places) was invaluable to me. It became a theatre of dreams in which it was possible to be anyone and anything, and to do unto others exactly as they, and you, wished to do. This is in the days before the net was just another Mall, of course. As it's developed it's become more and more a part of everyday life. It remains useful to me as a reference and research tool - but it's no longer in any sense what it once was, and is much the worse for it.

If I want to see ads for viagra all I have to do is turn the TV on.

But in the days before scanners were universal, before webcams had even been heard of, when VOIP wasn't even a gleam in a geek's eye, when all you had was your imagination and a keyboard, people were able to live intensely secret alternate lives that allowed them to express the deepest and most hidden parts of themselves in ways which were without real-time consequences. No threat of disease, of scandal, of real-time violence.

That in itself was a tremendous asset to someone bent on exploring forms of sexuality that terrified him because the desire to experience them was so utterly over-powering. I spent years online exploring what I am because I knew that if I once let it loose in my actual life it would consume me and everything around me. But online it was contained, separate: safe. And because it was safe to do whatever I wanted in a purely virtual world without the constraints of the actual world to limit action, I tortured, raped and murdered my way around the various BDSM chatrooms of VP - and became, for the first time in my life, popular. I was notorious for the detailed grotesqueries of the online scenes I constructed - and I had no lack of willing partners.

It's irrelevant, the question of whether my partners were of the sex they presented themselves as, whether anything they told me was in any way 'true'. It was all true, no matter how 'false', because each experience was a shared imaginative reality. What we did (and I won't regale you with the details), I and those people, we actually did, in the worlds that we constructed.

Such things are impossible now, because 'truth' and 'reality' infest the net like a disease. If I weren't as lazy as I am, I'd invest in a decent Encyclopedia and never look at Google again - just to spite the clever bastards who invented it and make a profit off my interest every time I use the damnable thing.

Onward, through the fog...

What I realised, in consequence of my many virtual lives (I spent two or three years as an online 'lesbian', because I wanted to see if I could successfully infilitrate that online community and be accepted by it) is that I am either possessed of, or possessed by, desires of an absolute fury that in themselves are without limit. What rouses my hunger, I hunger for absolutely. And since these desires know no limit in themselves, and since there is no one but myself to impose a limit upon them, I developed (at first without any understanding of it) an ability that is absolutely crucial to anyone who wants the things I want. The ability to seperate out some tiny, some miniscule, fraction of my consciousness and set it as a kind of watchdog over myself.

When it barks I listen - because it only ever barks when I'm in such a frenzy that if I were to take what I am doing at that moment any further - then everything else I value (such as liberty) falls under serious threat of loss. You can't restrict the flow of blood to someone's brain and be incapable of self-control. If you are, your partner will die. For those instants, your partner's life is, literally, in your hands.

I was born in the wrong era. I should have been an early Medieval Prince, with power of life and death over my serfs and none but God to answer to. Had that been so, rather than my being born into this misbegotten age of knowledge without wisdom, competence without power, religion without spirit; into a world entirely demystified in which 'magic' is nothing more than crass and contemptible conjuring, then my name would be legendary now.

Trust me. You'd still be frightening your children with it.