"If it's provable we can kill it."
Published on April 21, 2007 By EmperorofIceCream In Misc
After fourteen days of unemployment I'm working again. Whereas I recently worked for D now I work for T. T is a large civil engineering company here in Richmond - the office I work in downtown is less than twelve minutes away on a route that has little traffic.

I liked the office as soon as I got into it on Wednesday, when I attended the interview. It occupies three floors in a very large historic building downtown - but without being a part of the business area. The area the building occupies is bohemian: full of students, an Irish bar a couple of blocks away, an art gallery and fancy furniture store close by. Lots of attractive women wandering about - and much, much more rarely, the occasional attractive man as well. I noticed that most female college students attract me in England - and the same is true here.

Inside, the building is a maze. Lots of misshapen illogical corridors with doors leading into rooms beyond - all of which are clearly visible because the doors are glass, the corridor wall are a brilliant white and everything is strongly lit without the light being dazzling. And its completely silent. Very little talking about anything not immediately connected to work goes on, and for the most part everyone works in complete silence. Which is how I learned to do this job in the first place and how an office of that kind ought to be. This particular project doesn't demand much in the way of complex draughting skills: if you can split a line and manipulate vertices then you pretty much have everything you need. But even so it involves some actual drawing for a change, and very close attention to detail.

This isn't the first time I've used ArcESRI products - but it is the first time I've actually enjoyed using the interface, as well as finding the actual image on the screen to be satisfying. So I'm a GIS geek. Sue me.

I've worked with AutoCAD, SmallWorld, ArcFM and DRS - which is a system originally developed by the Ordnance Survey in the UK and is peculiar to that institution. DRS is by far the prettiest. Look at a monitor running images produced by the DRS software, and the maps look like different colored intestines and delicately partitioned organs on a jet-black background. The colors are jewel-like in intensity. You use a virtual draughting table and a puck with that one - which is something else I like about DRS.

GE's SmallWorld is the most baroque in the number of its editors, all available as mini-GUIs on screen, and the array of its capabilities. It's also the most demanding to use in terms of what the operator actually has to do. There's (or there was) an enormous amount to remember in order to use it efficiently. But it's also the most satisfying to work with in terms of the things it can do and the discretion the operator has to choose between different techniques. There is, or was, a level of individualism and personal expression involved.

The project I used SmallWorld on was also the most technically demanding I've been involved in, mapping the entirety of a large utility's network in every detail. This present job is much less demanding in that sense, but it still involves the creation of entities and representations in what is essentially a map. What I do isn't cartography in the sense that Mercator understood the word, but it is a form of mapping.

I'm working on a project updating work carried out to create a digital record of every road center line in Virginia. Roads change a lot. New roads appear, and sometimes old roads are no longer used. But center lines don't constitute a route map and aren't represented in the same way that most maps represent roads. You'd be hard pressed to recognise it for what it is, without being told. It makes the screens around the room look technically sophisticated and impressive - at least to me.

The floor I work on is one large, well-lit room, dived up into six assymetrically shaped pods, each holding two workstations. There's at least eight and possibly ten in the room, besides the secretary at her desk by the glass doors. My podmate is E. She's perhaps twenty-two or twenty-three, but seems considerably younger. Her face is very alert and intelligent, her gaze direct though a little diffident. She's happy to talk about something definite - books, movies etc., and can talk intelligently - but won't chitchat. And she's reed thin, has breasts the size of wren's eggs, and hips as straight as a boy's. She's also fond of semi-goth-y outfits and not-quite-platform boots that reach to her knees. Needless to say, I'm very happy to have made her acquaintance.

E sits to my right and behind me. To my left is Wy. He's a former coastguard and very helpful. He has massive sand coloured eyebrows, pale blue eyes and a nose long and sharp enough to open letters with. He reminds me of a younger, saner version of Chris-who-hummed-methodist-hymns-while-his-eye-twitched. Chris was my supervisor on a job in England. He once emailed me to tell me my head was leaking. He sat opposite me and was distracted from his humming of hymns by the volume I had the Walkman playing at.

So far I like the job. So far it's a huge improvement over the last one. We'll see.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 21, 2007
Congrats! I'm glad to hear you found something so quickly this time around -- and that the work is something you are interested in.

Good luck!
on Apr 21, 2007
Glad you are (tentatively) enjoying your new job.

I love how you described the building and your co-workers.

How big are wren's eggs? LOL. Small? Very small?
on Apr 22, 2007
How big are wren's eggs? . Small? Very small?


Ultra small.
on Apr 22, 2007
Good luck!


Thank you thank you thank you.
on Apr 22, 2007
Yes, congrats on the new job. I can almost picture how the building would look, but can't get over the idea of a workplace being quiet.

I work with two people who talk to themselves out loud, which is sometimes funny, but mostly exasperating. One's a financial officer, and that I can somewhat understand. Most usually she talks about specific account numbers, or certain codes that need to be used. The program coordinator mumbles titles, and regularly interrupts me when she remembers something that I may, one day in the future, need to know.

The funny thing is that we have three offices between the three of us. Unfortunately, my office houses the finance binders, so there are many times during the week where we are all in this one room just to save time in trekking back and forth. The other thing is that our section of the university seems to be open-door. Everyone who has their own offices keeps their door open, which means that everyone who walks by can peek in and say hello. It's rude to close the door when you are actually working. I don't quite get it, but that office protocol for you.

Again, congratulations, and I'm glad to hear that the job sounds promising.
on Apr 22, 2007

as long as they use your skills and don't let you just sit and rot {like last job} AND you get lots and lots of money compensating you for your obvious good looks.. hahahahahah I can stop worrying about how my two friends are going to make it.

 

Elie who loves Simon and Sabrina

on Apr 22, 2007
I can almost picture how the building would look, but can't get over the idea of a workplace being quiet


'Quiet' doesn't really do it justice. It's virtually silent. The last place I worked, the girl in the cubicle to the right of me was conducting some sort of office semi-incest with the old paternal type who worked in the cubicle immediately in front of hers. She flirted with him endlessly, vocally and loudly. She also sang. Cheerfully. I'm not sure if I despised her singing more or her endless cheeriness while she did it.

I can imagine myself as a monkish figure toiling over arcane illustrations - something out of Name of the Rose, perhaps - and afterwards relaxing by flogging postulants by candlelight.

I was born much, much too late. I should have been either a tenth century monk, or a seventeenth century English Gentleman of the Road (a highway man). Or an Earl. If I couldn't be a highwayman I'd want to be an Earl.

That's a sample of the thinking with which I entertain myself at work. While what I do requires considerable attention to detail it doesn't at this level require much thought. There's a certain mental space left free, through which entertaining nonsense tumbles.
on Apr 22, 2007
Elie who loves Simon and Sabrina


Awwww. Sentimental sod. But thanks anyway.
on Apr 24, 2007
Today is day four of my new employment. The first two days were a kind of settling in period: find the restrooms (very well fitted out and immaculately clean), find the kitchen (more easily said than done, the place is a little labyrinth), meet the project manager (Sarah - a cheerful and very attractive young woman of twenty six or so - most of the project managers seem to be younger than thirty), meet co-workers in the pods around me, and get to first base with the software. My first day I think I made around fifty edits to the map I'm working on. Day two, I made around a hundred and seventy five. Day three, three hundred and sixty nine. Day four? Two hundred and fifty. Why the drop? Because I spent too much time socialising. Socialising is a necessary part of fitting in to a new workplace, so it wasn't time wasted exactly - but it prevented me from reaching my goal of over four hundred edits. At the very latest, I want to be making between four hundred and fifty to five hundred edits per day by the end of work on Friday - which will put me over the expected average production rate by the end of my first full week.

So who was I socialising with? Another young female, probably in her early twenties though conceivably younger, whom I will call J. The first thing I noticed about her, other than the tattoos on her arms, were the scars on her wrists - faint, but perfectly discernible if like me you have a predisposition to noticing such things. At some time in her past J has been a semi-serious cutter. And the first thing we talked about was music. We went for a walk and a cigarette along the canal and almost the first thing she asked me was "What are you into?" I grinned, thinking to myself how much of a puppet J is, and how she might react if I told her just a few of the things I'm into. Probably with horror. But maybe not, not after the thought had had chance to work in her awhile.

Naturally, I didn't tell her. So I mentioned two of my favorite bands, Cradle of Filth and Dimmu Borgir - much to her delight as she is of course an avid fan of Gothic Romanticism - blood, passion and death under a Full Moon. I doubt she'd take kindly to the characterisation as being true now. She was a Goth, but she's much more experienced and over all that now. Aye, of course she is. And every day herds of flying pigs pass over Richmond. She transferred a bunch of music files over for me, and lent me a pair of head-phones to listen to them. It seemed like a kindness at first, as I'm sure she thinks of it, but there is something 'clingy' and almost manipulative to the act; she seemed just a fraction too eager.

And tomorrow, unless I'm much mistaken, I will have to find a way to gently but firmly decline her invites outside to smoke. She hates the job, just as I hated working at D. She compares herself to those she graduated with and the jobs they are doing - and makes no secret of her dissatisfaction with the result of the comparison. But she's young enough that her dissatisfaction has lead to resentment rather than a determination to do better for herself. It's a bad habit of mind to get into, resentfulness. It can poison lives. It can render you impotent to bring about change in your own life.

Along with her resentment is the conviction shared by all young people that they are immortal, that time is on their side; that they can wallow in whatever emotional stye they are stewing in because there will always be a tomorrow. And just as no one could have told me that there is nothing further from the truth, so no one can tell her. She wouldn't believe it, and would resent the advice.

C'est la vie, c'est la guerre. It took me forty three years to reach a point where I could decide to do something radically different with my life and try again somewhere else. It might take her as long or longer to come to a similar decision. Or maybe she'll wake up tomorrow morning and realize that only she can do something about her resentment, and then do something about it. Stranger things have happened.

But somehow I have my doubts.
on Apr 24, 2007
Congrats, I'm late to this article, but it's great to hear you've found something that seems to be alright to you! I agree with Tex about your descriptions. You are very observant which is always good to be, especially when you have to work in an office environment. The socializing part of it is oh so necessary, it's a bit distracting, I agree, but it's necessary to a degree. Good luck!
on Apr 25, 2007
To: foreverserenity

it's great to hear you've found something that seems to be alright to you! I agree with Tex about your descriptions.


Thank you very much, on both counts. And yes, the social part of it can be a chore - as in any situation where you are thrown together with people you haven't chosen to be with (and in a lot of cases wouldn't choose to be with). There's only ever been one instance of someone I knew at work, a man I can honestly say I hated. He was my training supervisor when I got my first job working as a digitizer, in England.

I worked at the Data Capture Center, near Nottingham, on a ten hour night-shift (actually my preferred time of work). We worked 40 hours a week, hence four nights. So the 'two week' training period was actually only eight shifts and there was an enormous amount to learn. During the eighth shift the Night Manager came and asked everyone in the training team three questions each. If you answered each one correctly and without hesitation, you kept the job. If not, you were shown to the door immediately after all the questions had been asked and answered. Answering three arcane questions without having to think of the answers proved something to me, because I only retain information with that kind of indepth understanding when I'm seriously interested in it. I like digitizing; even at the simplistic level I work on presently (and it's a very long way down the GIS foodchain from what I did at the DCC to what I'm doing now) there's something satisfying in it.

Wayne was my training supervisor. Petty and vindictive, he knew what he was doing in relation to digitizing. The night of the seventh shift I said, jokingly (but it was no joke really), that I'd be glad to be out from under his beady eye. In a way, it was a token of respect. He had a very beady, accurate eye. He took what I said very badly.

He ran quality assurance (QA) on my first work after I'd been hired. He slaughtered it, not by inventing errors but by ignoring the convention in that office that didn't take into account non-connectivity related errors; in particular 'stylistic' errors related to label placement. Wayne disagreed with every one of my placements and gave them maximum penalties. Which had the very real consequence that I was never able to qualify for bonus because that was worked out on the basis of errors aggregated over time - and I had such a monstrous deficit as a consequence of Wayne's petulance that it always kept me right on the edge.

I hated on that man for years afterwards, until I met him again on another jobsite. And learned he'd spent the last few years on the verge of death due to cancer. He'd suffered woefully and as a consequence I stopped actively hating on him, even though I didn't forgive him and won't. I hope the rest of his life is equally miserable, if not more so, and I wish him a lonely and painful death.

That man fucked with my livelihood and did so out of pure spite.

So yes. Being sociable is important.
on Apr 25, 2007
That man fucked with my livelihood and did so out of pure spite.


That's dreadful! Payback's a bitch uh? Terrible that he had cancer but sometimes in life the way we live and how we treat others comes back to haunt us in the worse ways!


on Apr 25, 2007
Payback's a bitch uh?


I entertain myself with the idea that I hated him into developing cancer. Unlikely I know. But I can always hope.
on Apr 26, 2007
Today is my seventh day of gainful employment with T. And as a Company, T continues to impress. It's apparent that there's a policy to employ young, talented, energetic people as project managers. It's becoming apparent that it's also policy for these young, energetic, talented people to provide ongoing support to the operators working on the actual projects. I spent a very interesting forty minutes with Jf this afternoon, being introduced to the intricacies of topological analysis. This is the first incidence I can remember in which higher level technical staff have willingly devoted time (time which took him away from his work and me away from mine) to answering a question that has no immediate application but will have considerable importance in the future: how to conduct a topological analysis to first identifty and then correct errors.

My benchmark of excellence in all things related to GIS drafting is always going to be GE's SmallWorld suite. One of its excellences is the sophistion of its OP-QA (operator quality analysis) system. This is a subset of tools that allows the drafter to check his work before submitting it to the formal QA process. It was a vital aspect of the work I did for East Midlands because our bonus depended on errors aggregated over time. OP-QA wasn't as sophisticated as the formal QA process but it did allow for the elimination of major errors. And once you knew how to find it in the forest of available sub-menus it was easy to access and use.

Topological analysis in ArcFM is the exact opposite of that statement. It's laborious, overly-complex, non-intuitive, and provides only the crudest facilities for intepretation of its results.

And this is a very good thing. Why? Only experienced users of the system can carry it out, and I intend to become as experienced as possible as soon as possible. It's time-consuming, which means that the period of the project's life-span devoted to QA will be extensive. It's also crucial to a Company's reputation as, in the end, what counts is the product you deliver. The more you're able to contribute to the final delivery of a high end product the higher your standing in the Company involved. I don't for a minute labor under the illusion that such a contribution guarantees a permanent position. But what it does guarantee (pretty much) is a glowing reference.

And a contractor is only as good as his last reference. That was why I tolerated the unmitigated boredom of both my positions with D. As an immigrant I have no work history here. To be re-hired at a higher rate of pay by the same prestigious company (no matter how little that prestige is actually deserved) is a testimony itself. To garner exceptionally good references from the managers of both the projects on which I worked is icing on the cake.

To then gain employment with an even more prestigious Company, and (eventually) to garner just as glowing a reference (and bear in mind that every Company in this field, because it's so small, talks to every other Company) is an outcome that can only add value to me as an employee. I don't have a 'career' as such. But I do have a reputation, and I'm keen to advance it in every way possible. Working for T is very much a step in that direction and, trust me, I intend making myself of real value to them.

My little tete-a-tete with Jf is a case in point. The question I asked was motivated by genuine curiosity and a desire to learn (and it's the genuineness of the interest that prevents me being written-off as another ass-kisser trying to wring what he can from the Company). But I'm a long way from being unaware of the strategic value of the incident in its own right. Jf is a young man of some importance.

In his own quiet way, and in the terms of the work-role, he's also something of a motherfucker. He's already thrown me in at the deep end of the pool and left me to sink or swim on my own, by assigning me the work I'm currently doing. As one of my co-workers mentioned, it's unusual for a new employee to be assigned the type of work that has been given to me. I think Jf wished to see if I lived up to what others said of me. As a result of the topoligical analysis I ran today I can say that I have, pretty much. Out of 1300 edits there were four errors, three of them spurious (that resulted from known problems with the software). The final error, a real one, resulted from a failure to appreciate the logic of the software - which Jf was kind enough to attribute to his own failures as an instructor. Needless to say, I carried on the exchange of courtesies by assuming responsibility - and making it plain that I won't make the same mistake again, which I will not.

How we dance around each other in these things. And how much I have learned to appreciate the nuances of a contractor's life, over the years. Contractors are absolutely vital to the industry - and out of the very limited pool of such contractors, very occasionally, a rare few are lifted into full - and very well paid - employment.

But when that happens, and it will, it will be on my terms and to my advantage. While I may well look like a cabbage, I'm a very long way from being green.
on May 05, 2007
Tell us more about your podmate, E. She sounds fascinating. What does she do? Is her job the same as yours?
2 Pages1 2