"If it's provable we can kill it."
Or, why contempt is often justified
Published on November 26, 2006 By EmperorofIceCream In Misc
Let me make something plain to you all. Since coming to America my experience here has taught me that Racism is justified.

I was at one time a European, and in this context that means that I believed that there was absolutely no basis for racial prejudice. I grew up in Great Britain, one of the most ethnically diverse nations on Earth. The Blacks that I knew, all of whom came from Jamaica, the West Indies (a great cricketing Nation), and Africa, all thought of themselves as British before they thought of themselves as Black. Their complaints, which were justified, had everything to do with the fact that British society as a whole failed to recognise just how British they actually were, rather than with any failure to respect their Blackness. I went to a school which had a population of 2000 students, 99% of whom were Black. I bought ganga (marijuana) from the Black kids in the school corridors. I went to their homes, as they came to mine, and ate their foods. I associated with Black kids at every turn, I spoke Black British Jamaican patois. I listened to bootleg imports of Jamaican Reggae (Bob Marley is a poor substitute for real Jamaican Reggae) and thought of those children as my friends, my equals, and my co-countrymen.

They were as British as I was, and the color of their skin had nothing whatever to do with the issue of whether they were British or not. Black, White, they were born in my country and that made them co-citizens with myself. They spoke of themselves as British. They followed the same Cricket and Soccer teams that I did. Their interests and my interests were the same.

Which is why I was fundamentally opposed to racial prejudice. Had you called a Black friend of mine a nigger I would have beaten your ass into the ground and stomped your face afterwards. My mother has had more than one Black lover: they were all decent hard-working men who did their best by her, and tried, to the best of their ability, to deal with her two weird children. Most failed, as did the White men she has also known. But in each case, the weirdness of her children, and the subsequent difficulties she experienced, had nothing to do with the color of the skin of her lovers.

I remember an infamous instance in which my sister, Sarah, ferociously rebuked a Pakistani taxi-driver who had spent the entire journey condemning Blacks (and Jamaicans in particular) simply for being Black and Jamaican. She beat the little shit down (on completion of the journey - my sister was never a fool) and did so deservedly and properly. Jamaicans are wonderful people (and they grow stunning dope lol).

Though both she, I, and my mother, are undeniably prejudiced against Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis in particular, none of us would have dreamed of deliberately abusing them in public, nor of working against their interests. Why? Because, Bangladeshi or not, they were still British.

'British' is not an ethnicity. There are the English, the Scots, the Irish, and the Welsh (in order of racial importance). The terms 'Britain' and 'the British' did not enter popular usage until the 18th century (along with the use of the Union Jack as our Flag). Prior to that point there were separate racial and political identities that amalgamated as a result of political accommodations among the dynastic ruling classes associated with European aristocratic bloodlines. But among the common people there was, and to some extent is, only allegiance to the Flag and to the Throne. The rest was an irrelevance. If you served Queen and Country, you were British, and it made no real difference what color your skin was.

Certainly there were racial differences, and racial prejudice, among British peoples. One of my closest friends in Nottinghamshire, where I lived immediately before my departure for America, was notorious in the communities in which we both lived for having torched a house full of Pakistanis, killing all six of them. But he was the exception, rather than the rule. The majority of all British, no matter their ancestry or their skin color, want only to live peaceably with their neighbors - given the chance. And they want to do so on the basis of a shared identity as British - which is why the recent upsurge in Islamist violence has caused such scandal, offence and consternation in Britain.

The recent subway attacks have caused such infuriated disbelief, and such sudden suspicion of anyone seeming to be of Muslim beliefs and practice, precisely because they were so utterly alien to the British mindset. We were all of one kind, no matter our skin color. The transcendent horror, the disbelief and suspicion now associated with Muslims and their motivations in Britain, is caused by the inability to grasp why and how our own could have turned against us.

Britain was once closely involved in the slave trade. Hull, the town I love above any other place on Earth, Bristol and Liverpool, were all once heavily involved in the importation of African and West Indian slaves. But Blacks who live in those places think of themselves as British before they think of themselves as Jamaican or African, and the majority of them do not hold their contemporary fellow-Britains as either responsible for, or culpable in relation to, the injustices perpetrated by their forebears. Yes, there are certain Blacks who argue that Britain should make financial reparation for the horrors of the slave trade - but there are far more who believe that the past is the past and that the present should not be held hostage to what was done two hundred or more years ago.

They argue, rightly, that the effects of prejudice should be combatted now, because it is now that they and theirs suffer, and that the means taken to address that prejudice should be related to the problem of race relations as they are experienced now. And I could not agree with them more. Because the terms in which that debate is phrased are the terms of citizenship (or, in the case of Britain, the rights of subjects equal before the law).

I don't care if you are Black, Orange, Grey or Blue. I don't care if you are straight or gay. I don't care if you are Republican, Democrat, or radical Anarcho-Syndicalist. If you are a citizen then you are afforded the rights, privileges, duties and obligations that are mandated by the Constitution of the United States of America. And anyone who seeks to interfere with or deny to you those rights, obligations, privileges and duties is a criminal who ought properly to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Since Americans are so infernally obsessed by whom an individual has sex with, let me reiterate: straight or gay, Master or slave, fetishist or otherwise, none of these categories are relevant to your rights and duties under the Constitution and are utterly irrelevant to what is due to you as a citizen - and anyone who seeks to interfere with or deny to you your due under the Constitution is a criminal.

Now you know where I stand.

Under most circumstances, here in America, I would not be thought of as a Racist. With my European friends, those I've been unwary enough to discuss these matters with at any rate, it's a different matter. Those I think of as dear friends, who for my part are still dear friends, are no longer willing to talk to me. Why? Because I've been forward enough to say that the American Black, in the majority, is not fit to be associated with. That the American Black is a creature unique in history, both mentally and spiritually unequal to its co-countrymen (except that the majority of American Blacks deny that they are American, preferring the periphrasisis 'Afro-American'), a creature so traitorous that it must emphasise some spurious and entirely mythical allegiance to Africa before allegiance to the country of its birth.

As an aside, let me tell you that I frequently amuse myself by imagining the likely careers and fate of some of the 'Afro-Americans' of my acquaintance (and living and working where I do I know more than a few) if they were somehow magically to be transported to Africa. Bear in mind that I have known Nigerian Princes, Ethiopian peasants, and more than a few well-educated and successful true Africans, in my time in Europe. These so-called ghetto Africans would not last thirty seconds in the country they claim to prefer before the country of their birth - not thirty seconds. Their African-ness is as fake as their American-ness, and for the same reason - they have no connection to the fundamental values and realities of the truth of what they profess to be. It would delight me beyond measure to drop some of these nigger 'Africans' into the middle of the Kalahari, or into the heart of Pretoria or Mogadishu, and watch them squirm as real Africans treated them for the nigger wannabes that they are.

I know more about how to live among real Africans than they do - and I know nothing at all.

What is the great difference between these nigger 'Afro-Americans' and the Jamaicans, West Indians, Ghanaians, Nigerians, and other African peoples that I knew as I grew up in Great Britain? None of them were characterized by resentment - though they rightfully and properly resented the prejudice they experienced. None of them were characterized by the wilfull failure to respect the conventions and social practices of the nation to which they had immigrated - although all of them lived the lives of their native cultures within the life and practices of their host nation as private citizens (or subjects).

Contrast with this the behaviour of even the most decent, the most respectable, the most worthy of American Blacks. At every turn, there is the demand that White culture give way to American Black culture. There is the demand that every White citizen give precedence to Black citizens (even in the matter of seating arrangements in restaurants and planes) simply because one is Black and the other is White.

At every turn, there is the demand that Blacks be given preferential treatment - because their ancestors were slaves and mine were not. To which the short, and correct, answer (always bearing in mind that the Black in question is armed and predisposed to violence) is Fuck You, Nigger. Or would be, had not real Americans become so unsure of themselves that they have left themselves no answer to the moral blackmail of the niggers among them than 'Yes, sir'.

I'm forced to ask myself 'What has become of the White Man in America?' Why, exactly, is it that this contemptible deference to those who are so palpably and grotesquely our inferiors has become so widespread? And the answer, blindingly obvious to myself (not an American and therefore less susceptible to the base prejudices of the day) is this: America's prejudices, whether in favor of or against the Blacks amongst us, is determined by the unthinking Protestant morality upon which she was founded. A Protestant morality that unequivocally denied that there was any difference between the light of conscience in one man as opposed to that same light in any other man.

The American Black does not share that vision of equality. Instead, he views anyone with whom he is in competition to be just that. Hence the distinction between the mentality of the 'house nigger' and that of the 'field hand'. Any house nigger would willingly have sold into torment any field hand because the house nigger knew where his advantage lay - in service to the White Man. The field hand was a creature not capable of serving the White Man except through brute labor, and in no way the equal of the house nigger, and something to be oppressed and kept down at every turn. The only sense of community, of reciprocity, of equality and proper division the American Nigger has is in the community of mutual self-interest. Anything beyond that is not only anathema to him but, once explained, is nonsense on stilts.

White Americans believe that it is a sin to deny the equality of Black Americans, and are paralyzed by guilt whenever, despite their best intentions, they find themselves thinking (correctly) 'goddamn nigger'. Nothing could be further from the truth. In nine cases out of ten, so I've found, the only appropriate description of most American Blacks is 'goddamn nigger'. In nine cases out of ten. The tenth case is that of the American Negro. Even these, few as they are, are not the equal of the Black men and women I knew in Europe, with whom I happily associated and whom, rightly, I believed to be my equals.

The American Negro is hard working. He no more wants the support of the State in his day to day activities than I do. He prefers his independence to the recognition of his fellow Blacks - much as I prefer my independence to the recognition of anybody else. I live my life, I pay my taxes, I obey the law - as for the rest, fuck you. Mind your own goddamn business. But what the American Negro is willing to do is play the race card at every turn; what the American Negro is willing to do is to refuse to accept the demands of civility and to portray everyone else as culpable of heinous prejudice, wherever such an accusation is remotely tenable, because the American Negro is only one step removed from the American nigger - and the American nigger is resentment and self-pity personified.

Is the White Man virtue and self-respect personified? No. Not judging by my recent visit to a White-trash trailer park, populated by what I can only call White niggers. As I've said elsewhere, niggerdom is not predicated by skin color. But the majority of niggers in America are Black, and the defining characteristic of niggerdom is resentment.

Resentment is the realm of the incapable and the impotent. I have no interest in why niggers, of any skin color, feel resentful or are impotent. The fact is, that the nigger of any skin color is both - and it's long past time time to stop pandering to that sense of resentment, to stop pandering to the self-perceived inability of others to improve their lives.

I don't care how many niggers, White or Black, starve in the gutter. It's time that the rest of us made sure these parasitic swine got off their asses and made a contribution to the good of the whole, rather than feeling guilty for not being nice to their ancestors.

Fuck their ancestors, and fuck them too. If you want to be a part of America then contribute to America. I do, and I am, notwithstanding the fact that I'm a gimp.

If I can, so can you - whatever the color of your skin. And if you can then you ought to, for the sake of the respect you owe yourself as a human being and as a member of a polity - in this case case, the American polity.

Unless, of course, you'd rather be thought of as a nigger.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 26, 2006
I should, and do, give foreverserenity credit for inspiring me to write this.

Link
on Nov 27, 2006
Most racism is justified to the likes of the two of you lowlifes. Being white, I guess it's ok according to your logic to call you both White Trash.
on Nov 27, 2006
What an AWESOME article EOI.

And perhaps you have proven your point in light of the comment below:

Most racism is justified to the likes of the two of you lowlifes. Being white, I guess it's ok according to your logic to call you both White Trash.


on Nov 27, 2006
To: little whip

as you said to me in conversation earlier tonight - in general I am too direct to appeal to the sensibilities of most here in JU. Not all, but most. One reason I love you is that you are as straightforward as myself, and often more so. One reason out of many.
on Nov 27, 2006
To: Xythe

Thank you for the compliment. Our anonymous troller is obviously a Democrat: one of those Democrats who feels that any kind of thinking that doesn't conform to whatever shibboleth they favor is a heretic and an apostate. A Democrat whose preferred form of democracy is that which prevails among lynch-mobs.

C'est la vie, c'est la guerre.
on Nov 27, 2006
Being white, I guess it's ok according to your logic to call you both White Trash.


Call me what you like. The contempt of the fool is a compliment to the wise.
on Nov 27, 2006
I'm feeling a bit tired and will try to give this a proper response! You know some people may say what they want about you Simon but you (and your wife) do say what you mean, quite clearly without worrying about whether anyone reading will take offense.

I try to do the same most times and curb my words a bit here and there, but I'm me and not you. Although that doesn't make me a liar or a coward, it makes me admire you for your directness and honesty!

I'll be honest and say that I thought to myself that I guess some people will likely say I started something with my article, and of course being black I must feel it's alright for me to do that and not they. Of course anyone who would think this way is totally wrong. It's a free country, and a free website(LOL!) and I don't monopolise the thinking of anyone, and then I said to myself, well your mommy didn't raise a coward and I've done nothing wrong but to have others share their thoughts so to heck with anybody who got offended and might be calling me names under their breath!

To you I say, I'm glad you shared your point of view, as you did when you responded on my blog. I'm thankful for your honesty, as I was with everyone who responded and it's always interesting to learn more about other people and how they grew up.

While I am in agreement with some of what you have said, and are saying, it's always good to have these type of discussion because as Mason said when he responded on my blog, how else can we clear the air (or something to that effect)!

The quickest thing for some people to do as the trollmeister above is to immediately revert to name calling instead of reasoning intelligently. This is where most people go wrong and yes, black people do it too, a lot, they don't look at another's viewpoint to first listen and hear what is being said, then share their view points, whether they agree or not with what your statement is. That's the way to a dialog of understanding.

I do hope Simon that your views of what a nigger is will not turn your thinking against all American Blacks (and I know you don't feel this way about all of us, as I stated, even I being born elsewhere and of a different mindset, is classified as one, unless I say otherwise [I do because I'm proud of where I'm from], and I'm also proud to be an American).

Yes there are many who deserve this way of thinking but there are still the few who are trying to live this down, who are constantly reminded that this is all some people do see, just because; just because of those who will not change their mindset, both black, whites and every race out there; just because of those who are like them, blacks, who make it so difficult to be black in American; when all they are trying to do is to improve their lot in life, and to make it better for their children.

It's a pity that there are people out there like some of the political and community leaders who will continuously feed them the wrong information, with the constant dumbing down and hand outs to make them feel like they are living a good life and not expect any better for themselves. These leaders only make things worse when all they do is feed the fire of hate instead of first calling to and speaking to our youths who so need the guidance instead of being fed the crack (drugs and otherwise) that they are given. We do need to start within, to look within ourselves and make our lives better by first admitting to our own mistakes and failures and moving on from there. Only then will there be no more niggers in America and only then will that word be banished from our vocabulary forever. We must first stop doing to ourselves what was done so many, many years ago.

[And I thought I was too tired!LOL!]
on Nov 27, 2006
It seems to me, sitting here in my lily white suburb, easy to agree or disagree with the article.

I've worked with black Americans in the past. I've befriended black Americans. And their "blackness" was as much an adjective when describing them as was their height, or clothing description.

I don't use the word nigger. Even when a black American is acting badly, I don't think calling them a name which focuses on their blackness, and not their behavior, really does anything for them or for me.

You can redefine nigger here Simon, for yourself, but most people use the word in reference to black Americans. Historically it conveys color, but as you stated, is also linked to behavior (a newer link).

You make good points, and I really enjoyed your insight on what makes one British. I would submit that America, if she holds, will one day be in that place. Britain, by necessity and her love of conquering (or was it colonizing..hahaha), accepted various races into her bosom. She is also much much older and therefore more mature.

America has not really hit puberty yet on a world wide scale. That is probably why we are so darn optomistic..heh. But eventually I think we will get there. Things are progressing at least, and have come a long way in race relations in my lifetime. How much more in ten lifetimes?

The further we get from slavery, the smaller the divide.

That's my two cents.

on Nov 27, 2006
I don't really have an experiences to comment with except to say I think I understand the 'white nigger' concept. These are people who think the world owes them something, even though they're not prepared to do anything to earn it. Oh, yeah, we have 'em here too. We call them bludgers.
on Nov 27, 2006
To: foreverserenity & Tova7

I do hope Simon that your views of what a nigger is will not turn your thinking against all American Blacks (and I know you don't feel this way about all of us, as I stated, even I being born elsewhere and of a different mindset, is classified as one, unless I say otherwise [I do because I'm proud of where I'm from], and I'm also proud to be an American).


I'm going to tell you both a true story.

The process of immigration to the USA is long, complicated, expensive, and involves many encounters with agents of the Federal Government. One of my first such encounters occurred when I applied for my first work permit, and involved a trip to a Federal building in Cleveland. Sabrina and I went there together. To gain entry we had, of course, to pass through a security checkpoint. This security station was run by two guards, both of them male, both of them Black. I passed through first, and as I did so I looked this particular Black man in the eyes and said "Good morning, Officer." Those eyes, which were clear, and unusually intelligent in appearance, widened considerably. After a pause he said "Good morning... take it easy, Brother." To me his response seemed only one more example of the easy familiarity that comes so readily to all Americans.

That was an eventful morning. The office we needed to visit was many floors above ground level, it was packed and heaving with people of several different colors and many different nationalities. Sabrina has a horror of both tall buildings and fires, so when an alarm sounded, and we were required to remain where we were, she was very close to panic. Only later that day, after we were back in Painesville with our mission accomplished, did she tell me that she had been positively shocked by the guard's response. In all her many years dealing with American Blacks, she had never heard one address a White man as Brother.

Her shock recalled to me his shock, and evident surprise. I was neither particularly loud, nor particularly effusive, in the way I had addressed him and it took me awhile to understand what it was that had so affected him. It was simply this, or so I believe: when I spoke to him I hadn't been looking at his skin. I had been looking at him, and I had spoken, unthinkingly, with the respect that was properly due to his Office. It's been a long while since that day in Cleveland, and I have learned, over the intervening years, to look at a person's skin before I look at the person. That's a lesson I would rather have not been taught by America. But I am at least aware of the fact, and do my best not to fall prey to that peculiarly American temptation.

I'm aware of the historical origins and development of the term 'nigger' and there can be no denying that it is in its origin an insulting racial epithet. And? So? Y'all (as they say here) need to wake up and smell the coffee. The past cannot be altered nor even redeemed - it can only be learned from. But none of you, Black or White, is able to learn because, or so it seems to me, you all, too willingly, look first at a person's skin before looking at the person - and do so without being in the least aware of what you are doing. 'Nigger' is certainly a racially-inspired epithet - it's also a proper noun and a perfectly apt description of certain types of person and certain types of behaviour; a noun earned and deserved by those types of person who indulge in those types of behaviour - whatever color their skin happens to be.

Yes, Tova: America is indeed a cultural adolescent - and it will never progress beyond adolescence until its people learn how to learn from their history and cease to see that history as a personal condemnation and a personal excuse for the most egregious, contemptible, disgusting behaviour. In short, y'all need to pull your thumbs out of your asses and grow up. Myself, if I could, I'd put every damn one of you over my knee and give you the strapping you rightly deserve for your ridiculous and inexcusable behaviour.

When I came here I instinctively and without thought looked at the person before I looked at their skin. I have observed in myself that I have since learned to look at a person's skin before I look at the person. It's a lesson I am doing everything I can to unlearn, and will unlearn because I'm determined to do so. Y'all need to make the same decision, and make it right quick. America is too great a nation, and her people are too fine, to be defined by such wicked nonsense.
on Nov 28, 2006
To: dynamaso

Oh, yeah, we have 'em here too. We call them bludgers.


From what I've observed through following recent developments in the UK online, the British now have their own enclaves of niggers too. Unforunately (at least in this case) Britain follows America in everything she does - though with a lag of about fifty years. It saddens me immensely, since it is a complete betrayal of the England I once knew.

C'est la vie, c'est la guerre.
on Nov 28, 2006
Well, you can't strap every one of them, Master, but I'm way overdue.


This is another article alone in itself, and one I look forward to you Simon, authoring at some point. About 8 years into the LS, I would truely love to see what type of writing you have on this subject
on Nov 28, 2006
I have observed in myself that I have since learned to look at a person's skin before I look at the person.


That is the crux Simon. How difficult will it be for you to stop? Now imagine if you were raised to notice skin color first.

I grew up in a lot of different places. When I was younger they were mostly black. I heard things like, "Those blacks will be taking over soon." Stuff like that from the few whites living around us. When I got into fights, chances are it was with a black girl(s) and my mom was always so proud.

Then I got older, away from the adults around me, and started hearing how its not "right" to judge a person on their color. I remember thinking about that long and hard as a pre-teen and coming to terms with the rightness of it.

After that I did see color, but I DIDN'T allow it to be the determining factor in developing friendships. However, I couldn't bring someone black to any home in which I stayed as a child, but that wasn't a big issue because there weren't many blacks around me physically then, I moved a lot.

When I joined the military I went off to basic training. I noticed color because I am not blind, and because I had not been around blacks in quite some time, and my upbringing still swirled in the back of my head.

But I was an adult, no longer slave to my childhood, and decided to befriend people on their own merit. Therefore, I was friends with both black and white.

What I noticed is the longer I associated with my black friends, the less I noticed they were black. I remember sitting with one of my friends in a snack bar drinking a beer and hearing someone refer to her as a nigger. My first reaction was "What? Why are you calling her that?"

All that to say, I DO notice color, and maybe someday when blacks and whites live side by side in equal numbers prodigiously in this country, we'll stop being aware of even that. I don't know. Right now however, I do notice color, I just don't base my actions on it (or rather, I TRY to be conscious and not base my actions on it.)

Therefore I do not use the word nigger because it is an accusation of "color" in my mind. No matter who tries to claim it now, or redefine it. It still remains, to me and all those I know, a word based mostly on color.
on Nov 28, 2006
Wow, I just re read that and I hope it doesn't sound self righteous. My goal is discussion...and believe me, I have OTHER behaviors that are probably worse and need tending.

Just call me a WIP....Work in Progress.
on Nov 29, 2006
There are always, always exceptions to the rule, however, and just as people of any color can act like 'niggers' some men can act like a 'bitch.'


I find many women like the term "bastard" when ranting against men; actually f8cking batsards comes to mind This is not to detract from your point, for which I agree with completely.
2 Pages1 2