"If it's provable we can kill it."
Hire a fool, hire a jerk - who gives a damn if he can do the job?
Published on November 11, 2007 By EmperorofIceCream In Misc
Something that has impressed me in the worst possible way is this nation's preoccupation with what can only be called 'getalongness'. So long as everyone likes each other, so long as everyone gets along with each other, so long as everyone feels part of the team (no matter how utterly incompetent any given part of the team is), American employers would rather hire the getalong guy rather than the guy who knows how to get the job done.

"Despite a labor shortage in many sectors, some employers are pickier than ever about whom they hire. Businesses in fields where jobs are highly coveted -- or just sound like fun -- are stepping up efforts to weed out people who might have the right credentials but the wrong personality. Call it the "plays well with others" factor." (Link)

So. In order to please the idiots you've already hired - and who that works doesn't realise that most of his co-workers are idiots - you're going to hire yet more idiots, so that the idiots who presently work for you can continue to under-produce, rip you off, and generally fuck up your business, without feeling unhappy and so produce even less, rip you off to ever greater degrees, and fuck your business with an even greater sense of self-satisfied injustice than they already experience.

You people are incomparable imbeciles, and you deserve the utter destruction of everything you profess to believe in that's headed your way.

Tell me something, you unspeakable dumbasses, which is more important? That your co-workers like everyone they work with, or that those who work in your business are competent, reliable, and able to produce within deadlines - no matter how abrasive or 'unsuitable' their pesonalities happen to be?

"With the national unemployment rate low, at 4.7 percent, and the Baby Boom generation heading into retirement, employers from Microsoft Corp. to rural hospitals are worrying about finding enough workers. But companies like Rackspace Managed Hosting are bucking that trend, working hard to find reasons to turn people away. Rackspace CEO Lanham Napier said, "We'd rather miss a good one than hire a bad one."

We'd rather miss a good one than hire a bad one. What constitutes a 'bad one'? The kind of innovative, controversial, chance-taking thinking that used to typify American self-confidence, American industry, and American power. Not any more. Now, you're all so scared of causing offence that you'd rather accept second- or third-best choices, so long as they are uncontroversial and palatable to all, then pick the best and the brightest and most talented; just so long as no one in 'the team' feels uncomfortable.

Fuck the team.

"There's a possible downside, however. In a Harvard Business Review article titled "Fool vs. Jerk: Whom Would You Hire?" Tiziana Casciaro of Harvard and Miguel Sousa Lobo of Duke University point out that people generally like people who are similar to them, so hiring for congeniality can limit diversity of opinions. One venture capitalist told the authors that a capable manager he worked with built a team that "had a great time going out for a beer, but the quality of their work was seriously compromised."

Business is a social activity - but not a social club. Conflict, difference, spark original thinking and creativity - the kind of creativity for which Americans were once famous. Not anymore. No, now you pass the future of this country over to your competitors hand over fist - because you piss your pants whenever difficult decisions that involve choosing one option and rejecting another rear their ugly heads. God forbid you actually risk offending someone.

By all means, molly-coddle yourselves to destruction because you can't tolerate the idea that those who innovate and create productive and profitable change may not fit into your precious whitebread conceptions of what's acceptable. And meanwhile the rest of the world will laugh its ass off at you - laugh all the way to the bank.

You've became a nation of cowards and incompetents, and you don't even know it.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 13, 2007
So you're talking about the 1970s, right? The 1970s are the golden age?

sure, we taught you that too. the great relativism. The false liberty and the irresponsible attitude.


It's not relativism. That's something else entirely. As an example in the 1970s it was fairly acceptable to consider women incapable of working as well as a man. That's no longer the case. That's a moral shift and not really the result of moral relativism because it's pretty clear that in many jobs gender doesn't play a huge difference in results or efficiency.


who said the consumer is always rigth? to heck with that. We told you dont worry about what other people think. do your thing.


So long as you're not a communist. Or black. Or Muslim. Or gay. Or foreign in any way, shape or form. But otherwise sure, do your thing.


and guess what, your generation are more depressed, more suicidal and less thoughtful. we produced that.

Really? Or is it just that depression, suicide and 'thoughtfulness' have only been measured in the last twenty years ago, and even now aren't measured particularly accurately?

Also, what do you mean by thoughtfulness? Do you mean that there is actually less breadth of thought today when you can read, speak and do things from any culture on earth nearly anywhere on earth? Or is it just the decline in traditional American culture, with its own relaxing mix of injustices and intolerances, that you think has been reduced?

as for news papers, your profession, you see how many corrections and retractions and phony stories they had to apologize for nowadays? even the NY Times, the paper of record, do you know it is called that? that same paper is now full of errors, false statements, biased news coverage. They led the way to this fantastically tragic war ..... knowingly ...... based on false pretenses .... on purpose?


Simple answer? 30 years ago they didn't have to retract anything. They just reported and people believed. Now we're more discerning and have other sources of news, there's more retractions. As for the phony stories count please feel free to back that up. I'm sure some academic somewhere has done a study on it.
2 Pages1 2